Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robbie Marriage's avatar

Top four lists are tough to do because they're so small, but this is a good one. You probably have the right four names on here, but I'm going to argue for an honourary fifth. Considering I am Canadian, take my opinion as the biased one that it is, but it's tough to see Bret Hart left off for his efforts at keeping the company alive throughout the new generation.

If Bret Hart was on top, the business was okay, especially internationally. As the American business was dying, the WWF started going abroad every six weeks to try to make some money, and to do this they needed Bret Hart. With anybody else on the top of the card (mostly either Diesel or Shawn Michaels) the company was twisting in the wind, business wise. With Bret, it was not preferable, but it was workable.

I believe that's why when WCW started getting really hot (coincidentally, right after Bret Hart left WWF TV), Vince realised he'd made a mistake giving the belt to Shawn Michaels, and tried to get it back onto Bret Hart. Shawn would not give it to Bret Hart, so he threw a strop and went home, and the WWF did not miss him. We can say all we want now about the subjective quality of the matches, but the fact of the matter is that the company's continued existence hinged on the success of Bret Hart, and he did enough to keep it afloat long enough (despite Diesel and Shawn's best efforts to kill it) to get to the megastar that was Stone Cold Steve Austin, and everybody could go back to making good money again.

Expand full comment
The Pro Wrestling Exuberant's avatar

This is a great historical journey you wrote covering the major stars from WWE from its inception through a multi-decade period.

I'm going to home in on your comments on Hulk Hogan, because that's the era when I first started watching wrestling and going to live shows, and perhaps for whatever reason that period as fan remains the most vivid for me.

You're spot on about the roaring crowds and connection he had with the audience. I lived that, going to sold-out house shows every month that he headlined, and the crowd reactions were just wild, so genuine, and special to be a part of and looked every bit as electric as they look when viewing it back now.

I've read a lot over the decades about how he was a limited in-ring performer and not skilled, but that's not how I remember it as a fan from that period. I remember how exciting the title matches felt to watch, and they meant something, whether he faced Savage, Andre, Bossman or whomever. I never thought they were "bad" matches as a "paying customer." I was drawn in because of the characters in the ring, both the champion and his opponents, and it made me care about the world title.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts